JULY 2026  SEEDWORLD.COM/CANADA   43
scenes like declining public 
breeding funding, rising research costs, 
and a lot more. 
Why Value Creation Keeps Returning
The phrase “value creation” has become 
politically loaded in Canadian agricul­
ture.
To some farmers, it sounds like 
another cost. To others, it sounds like 
privatization. And for many, it remains 
an abstract concept. But the irony is that 
value creation already exists throughout 
agriculture.
Every producer checkoff is a form of 
value creation. Certified seed royalties are 
value creation. Technology fees are value 
creation.
The real debate isn’t whether value 
creation should exist (it already does 
in spades), but about which model best 
funds future innovation. For years, the 
industry explored multiple options, 
including end point royalties and trailing 
royalty systems. Consultations stretched 
across the better part of two decades 
and consensus couldn’t be reached. 
Eventually, the industry moved toward 
voluntary implementation.
That’s where the VUA entered the 
picture. Under the VUA model, growers 
purchasing participating varieties can save 
seed for future use while paying a royalty 
tied to that farm-saved seed usage.
The system remains voluntary and 
farmers can still choose non-VUA varie­
ties, but participating breeders gain a 
recurring revenue stream tied directly to 
adoption and performance. For support­
ers, that link matters. 
“The single stream of revenue for 
a private breeder is royalties,” explains 
KWS Seeds Canada Country Manager 
Kenny Piecharka. “Without confidence 
in return on investment, companies 
simply won’t invest at scale.” 
And increasingly, global companies 
are comparing Canada against markets 
that already solved this problem years 
ago.
Australia Did Not Wait
Few countries appear more frequently 
in Canada’s value creation conversations 
than Australia, and for good reason. 
Australia implemented an end-point 
royalty system in cereals more than two 
decades ago to positive reviews.
One striking example discussed 
during the webinar involved lentils. 
Australia has increased lentil production 
by leaps and bounds over the past 15 
years — from roughly 288,000 tonnes to 
nearly 2 million tonnes annually.
At the same time, Canadian stake­
holders point to stronger rates of realized 
yield gain in Australia compared to 
Canada in certain crops. The implica­
tion is difficult to ignore: countries with 
robust royalty systems appear better 
positioned to attract sustained breeding 
investment. 
Germany transitioned toward 
stronger farm-saved seed royalty systems 
in the early 2000s. Today, half of seed 
sales occur through certified seed chan­
nels.
“Across mature wheat-growing 
markets, the pattern is pretty consistent: 
public funding pressure leads to value 
capture systems, which in turn stabilize 
and accelerate breeding investment. 
Canada remains one of the few major 
grain exporters still navigating this,” 
Reinheimer adds.
The Private Investment Gap
The conversation around value creation 
is often framed as public versus private 
breeding. Industry leaders increasingly 
argue that framing misses the point 
Jason Reinheimer is global head of cereals and 
pulse research for Limagrain Field Seeds.
Todd Hyra is western business manager for 
SeCan.
entirely. The future, they say, requires 
both. But breeding is becoming more 
technologically demanding — and more 
expensive since it now involves artificial 
intelligence, genomic selection, advanced 
trait stacking, disease resistance complex­
ity and climate resilience. These tools 
require enormous long-term investment.
“We can’t just rely on grower levies 
and government dollars anymore,” says 
Saskatchewan Pulse Growers Executive 
Director Carl Potts. “The opportunities 
and challenges have become too com­
plex.” 
That complexity affects public 
organizations as much as private compa­
nies. Western Crop Innovations (WCI), 
formerly part of the Government of 
Alberta before becoming an independent 
producer-governed not-for-profit breed­
ing organization, represents a case study 
in how the landscape is changing.
WCI Executive Director Trevor Sears 
argues stable funding is now essential 
simply to maintain continuity.
“You can’t turn a breeding program 
off and on,” he explains. “Stable funding 
allows organizations to maintain staff, 
infrastructure, and breeding pipelines.” 
The Trust Problem
If the economic logic behind value crea­
tion appears increasingly compelling, 
why does the issue remain so conten­
tious? Because agriculture is built on 
trust, says SeCan Western Business 
Manager Todd Hyra.

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.