Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
122 SEEDWORLD.COM DECEMBER 2015 Elections The closer to home the more they matter A long and trusting relationship with our most important business partner ... is in jeopardy. Bryan Gentsch the public trust nor do they efficiently counterbalance one another. We worked diligently during our recent legislative session to ensure fee increases necessary to protect the integrity of our programs were included in the state budget as cost-recovered items after it became obvi- ous Commissioner Miller was fixated on larger appro- priations from the states general revenue. The fee increases announced in October bore little resemblance to the relatively modest 30 percent increases TDA had earlier indicated were needed and are accounted for in the state budget. Rather they represent a 153 percent increase in the Verifying Seed Quality and a 41 percent increase in the Certified Seed Programs respectively. Erosion of Trust Most of you probably work with a crop improvement association but we perceive value in TDA regulating our seed trade. The members of the Texas Seed Trade Association and its predecessor organizations have enjoyed an unbroken collaborative and successful rela- tionship with TDA for almost a century. This relationship has been based on trust effective communication and a willingness to collaboratively address our mutual and respective needs as partners. TDAs recently demonstrated reluctance to continue this trust-based relationship by choosing to forgo dis- cussions with our industry prior to announcing signifi- cantly higher fees particularly in light of our support for higher fees demonstrated earlier this year is both unprecedented and concerning. It has always intrigued me that national elections particularly for president have the greatest appeal. There has never been any doubt in my mind that the more local the election the more it impacts the voter. Interest in national politics is well and good but regard- less of its growing reach the federal government gen- erally does not wield influence over you and your family like your local school board county tax assessor or zoning authority. Likewise state elections impact you far more than most national contests. You will not have any difficulty convincing members of the Texas Seed Trade Association that all elections have consequences more so the closer they are to you and your business. SW TEXAS SEED PROFESSIONALS are getting a hard lesson in election consequences. We elect virtually all statewide office-holders in Texas a practice origi- nating shortly after the Civil War and common in the South. The practice was designed to prevent carpet- bagger governors from appointing the entirety of state government. On Jan. 1 2016 our newly-elected Commissioner of Agriculture the Honorable Sid Miller is unilaterally raising fees by an unprecedented margin. While these fee increases will likely remove more than 40000 from the bottom line of an average Texas seed company that might not be the worst of it. A long and trusting relationship with our most important business partner the Texas Department of Agriculture TDA is in jeopardy. Our fees doubled in 2011 as services were slashed and although painful those decisions were made col- laboratively and our input mattered. We have unan- swered questions about how the fee increases were formulated and sincerely doubt they are justified to administer our programs under required cost-recovery. The public comment period coincided with fall seed crop harvest and our request for an extension to allow our members time to carefully analyze the effects of the proposed fee increases on their businesses was summarily denied. Commissioner Miller was informed within weeks of taking office that TDA was 8 million in deficit. He was also informed that 50 open positions were being eliminated because they were unfilled and unfunded. He has been unsuccessful in restoring TDA funding to pre-2011 levels failing to procure the 21 million annual increase needed to replace a similar amount he voted to cut when a State Rep. in 2011. Lately Texans have tended to elect fiscal conserva- tives. Commissioner Miller claims to be one and was not in charge of TDA when it went 8 million into the red. Fiscal conservatives in Texas and elsewhere have occa- sionally sought to demonstrate their dedication to prin- ciple by ignoring or delaying necessary fee increases slashing budgets and in extreme cases eliminating their own agency or department. Viewed collectively and over time the effects can be unfavorable. Underspending can be just as damaging as over- spending. Neither advance ideal public policy serve BRYAN GENTSCH Executive vice president of the Texas Seed Trade Association