NOVEMBER 2026 SEEDWORLD.COM/CANADA 5 tools. The competition comes later through the varieties each breeding pro gram develops. Canada's Advantage May Already Exist Curtis Pozniak believes Canada has something many countries are trying to rebuild. The CDC director is frequently asked by researchers around the world how Canada’s public breeding system has remained so well connected. In many countries, he says, foundational research and applied breeding have become dis connected. Canada has largely avoided that problem by maintaining close links between discovery science, variety devel opment and commercialization. That interconnected system, he argues, should become even more important as breed ing becomes increasingly dependent on genomics, digital tools and data science. Rather than seeing public breed ing, private breeding or other structural models as competing, Pozniak sees them as complementary parts of one innova tion ecosystem. Pre-competitive research should remain collaborative. Variety development should remain competitive. “There is a general consensus that there’s no single actor that can deliver optimal breeding alone,” he says. Public breeding programs, he argues, continue to play a unique role by deliver ing varieties, crops, regions and long- term breeding priorities, even when they fall outside commercial priorities. They also pursue higher-risk research, train future plant breeders, and maintain long- term germplasm resources that deliver public-good outcomes that markets alone may not prioritize. From Projects to Partnerships Technology alone won’t determine whether Canada’s breeding system suc ceeds — stable investment and funding are equally important. Pozniak argues Chris Anderson of DL Seeds says private companies see immediate value in new partnerships because genomic prediction has become too expensive for individual organizations to build alone. Curtis Pozniak of the Crop Development Centre is frequently asked by researchers around the world how Canada’s public breeding system has remained so well connected. The opportunity to bring new tools used elsewhere into a crop like peas is an opportunity to maintain the competitiveness of the crop, says AAFC’s Francois Eudes. Processors are informing breeding discussions much earlier than they once were, says SaskPulse Director of Research and Development Sherrilyn Phelps. one of the greatest threats facing plant breeding is stop-and-start investment. “Plant breeding is a long-term ven ture,” he says. “We need stable funding to support that.” That philosophy is reflected in the CD’s newly announced lentil breeding partnership with SPG and APG. Rather than funding individual research projects, the agreement com bines operational support, producer input into breeding priorities and a roy alty model designed to reinvest revenue back into future breeding. For Pozniak, that represents an important evolution. Breeding programs require core funding to maintain long-term variety development, while research projects and industry partnerships help bring new sci ence into those programs. He also argues that royalties generated through success ful varieties should be reinvested directly into breeding, creating a more sustain able cycle of innovation. In fact, this is a
View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.