Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 524 IN2011, Monsanto’s patent on the first generation Roundup Ready trait in soybeans expired. When this happened, no one was sure what the market would be for the 20-year- old technology. But in the past four years, the seed industry has gotten to see how the market treats that product ... and in some cases, it’s not good. We’re seeing unscrupulous sellers, looking to make a quick profit by selling illegitimate seed, says Lorne Hadley of the Canadian Plant Technology Agency. Plant breeders and seed companies have worked diligently to provide farmers with quality seed, pushing the yield enve- lope. Hadley says farmers recognize these achievements but are being pressured by the current economic environment of depressed commodity prices. It’s easy to see how farmers could be enticed into buying lower cost seed, but Hadley says these “deals” come with a hefty price. “One farmer was offered soybean seed at a large discount, but this lower-quality seed ended up costing him hundreds of dollars per acre in lost yield,” Hadley says. After the sell, profit-seekers pack up, leaving farmers with no support. The concern for the seed industry, Hadley says, is that these illegitimate sellers lower the market for legitimate ones who work to forge strong relationships with farmers. Common seed in Canada is required to be of a registered variety to be sold, but illegitimate sellers can drive across the border, pick up a load of beans and sell them, Hadley says. “We know that the herbicide-tolerant trait is present in a large percentage of the soybean crop,” he says. “But if farmers buy common seed, they don’t know if they are getting Roundup Ready technology or Roundup Ready 2 — which is still under patent protection. It has become a buyer beware system.” Hadley says companies want farmers to be successful and view customers as long-term partners. But the bigger concern is the potential market disruption, says Darrel Armstrong, stewardship lead for Monsanto Canada. The original Roundup Ready trait in soybeans is the first large In the new post-patent environment, farmers and seedsmen are learning there’s more than meets the eye. acreage product to come off patent; how- ever, more technologies are scheduled to follow. Although Monsanto has commit- ted to maintaining approvals in key export markets for the original Roundup Ready trait in soybean for a period of time, there is the question about who will maintain these approv- als for any trait once the patent has expired and the developer no longer wants to sell the product. Once the import approval lapses or expires in a key market, that can put exports to the market at risk, Armstrong says. “Additionally many technologies have specific steward- ship needs that help protect the long-term durability,” he says. “With off patent technology, the grower may not receive the correct guidance, increasing the risk the technol- ogy may fail, which could also impact similar technologies. If that happens, no one wins.” Avoiding Market Disruption If farmers don’t have certainty in what they buy, they can not communicate to grain buyers or end users what technology is in their grain, making it difficult to ensure that products don’t end up in markets where they’re not approved. This was the impetus for the formation of a Joint Post Patent Working Group, bringing together CropLife Canada and the Canadian Seed Trade Association, of which both Hadley and Armstrong are participants. The group is tasked with developing strategies to: Maintain export market access for Canadian seed derived products; maintain confidence in the regulatory system; support sustainable production practices for post patent traits; and develop a clear, unified message. The working group has completed a white paper outlining the current state with roles and responsibilities, the chal- lenges and risks associated with the current structure, and guiding principles for the development of a new framework. The working group is expected to continue its efforts and looks to engage Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in discussions this fall. Julie Deering It’s “Buyer Beware”